• HOME
  • UNMAI
  • VIDUTHALAI
  • PERIYAR TV
  • PERIYAR PINJU
Newsletter
Modern rationalist
Advertisement
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life
No Result
View All Result
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life
No Result
View All Result
Modern rationalist
No Result
View All Result

Firm in unbelief

by Modern Rationalist
June 23, 2021
in Atheism
0
Firm in unbelief

Aakar Patel
Columnist and translator of Urdu and Gujarati Non-fiction works

Bhagat Singh’s well-argued essays are evidence of his maturity

Related articles

Mandelas ‘Ubuntu Atheism’ and Why it Matters

Mandelas ‘Ubuntu Atheism’ and Why it Matters

May 9, 2023
Congratulatory Message to FIRST WOMEN VICE CHANCELLOR, HAILING FROM THE SCHEDULED TRIBES

Sovereignty does not lie in “God”

February 17, 2023

Bhagat Singh died at 23 having led a full life. At 21 he threw bombs on the parliament building that India is about to abandon. Having spent two years in jail he was hanged in March 1931, though he demanded to be shot. I say he led a full life because he managed to become mature in his short youth, leaving us material that gives evidence of his maturity.

His collected writings are a slim volume, only 100 pages or so. The main piece in it is his essay on why he is an atheist. It is written as an apologia, a formal defence of his opinion. He penned it in jail, while awaiting execution — which makes it even more interesting. He felt compelled to write it because someone (we are not told who) had commented that Singh was an atheist because of vanity — implying that he thought too highly of himself to submit to an almighty.

My reward

At 22 (the essay was written in October 1930), Singh had become a national celebrity. His act of rebellion, his desire not to harm the enemy — the bombs were only whiz-bangs that produced smoke — and his ability to express himself clearly ensured that the media and the public were riveted to him. His good looks added to his charms and there was almost nobody across the political spectrum who didn’t support him. This might have led to the accusation that he thought too much of himself.

Singh defends himself against this in the beginning though he seems to make too much of the accusation. It is when he gets over his eagerness to show he is not narcissistic that his writing becomes beautiful. He accepts that belief has its uses — it softens hardship and can even make it pleasant. Then he asks what he gains by rejecting belief at this point in his life. The judgment is to come in a week’s time, he writes, and he knows what it is going to be. He will be hanged. If he had been a believer he would have had the solace of going to a better place, but he is convinced no god exists.

He writes: “I see that a short life of struggle with no such magnificent end shall itself be my reward. That is all. Without any selfish motive of getting any reward here or in the hereafter, quite disinterestedly have I devoted my life to the cause of freedom. I could not act otherwise.”

Standing for it

This is not the thinking of an average 22-year-old. Clearly, while he had absorbed his fame and was aware of it, he had been contemplating other things as he awaited death. Singh quotes Upton Sinclair and Darwin as he discusses the differences between various faiths and death.

He ends the essay with these lines: “One of my friends asked me to pray. When informed of my atheism, he said, ‘When your last days come, you will begin to believe.’ I said, ‘Never. I consider it to be an act of degradation and demoralization. For such petty and selfish motives, I shall never pray.’

Reader and friends, is it vanity? If it is, I stand for it.”

It becomes clear on reading this and Singh’s other essays why he has remained vivid in our imagination almost a century after his death. Singh was hanged in Lahore’s Shadman Chowk on March 23, 1931. About a decade ago, a group of Pakistanis petitioned their government to honour Singh (who had been born on the Pakistan side of Punjab). In 2012, the place was renamed Bhagat Singh Chowk.

Source:‘The Hindu’

Tags: Aakar PatelAtheismBhagat SinghBhagat Singh Chowkdegradation and demoralizationFirm in unbeliefjudgment
Previous Post

EXEMPLARY DRAVIDAM MODEL

Next Post

Discard Myths!

Related Posts

Mandelas ‘Ubuntu Atheism’ and Why it Matters

Mandelas ‘Ubuntu Atheism’ and Why it Matters

by Modern Rationalist
May 9, 2023
0

Mark Kolsen American Atheist During his life and especially after his death in 2013, Nelson Mandela’s faith has been hotly...

Congratulatory Message to FIRST WOMEN VICE CHANCELLOR, HAILING FROM THE SCHEDULED TRIBES

Sovereignty does not lie in “God”

by Modern Rationalist
February 17, 2023
0

Dr. K.Veeramani President Dravidar Kazhagam Vanakkam. Vigorous social worker Dr. Samaram, dynamic, action-oriented Vikas Gora, all the members of Gora...

What does it mean to oppose Brahmanism?

What does it mean to oppose Brahmanism?

by Modern Rationalist
February 10, 2020
0

Rajeev Bhargava Anyone who adheres to the principles of the Indian Constitution is automatically anti-Brahmanical A  few months ago, a...

‘Make Me turn Myself into an Atheist…’

‘Make Me turn Myself into an Atheist…’

by Modern Rationalist
February 6, 2020
0

- Jug Suraiya God in the CEO’s office, ready to be briefed by the HRO, Human Relations Officer. God: Well,...

MESSAGE OF GREETINGS

HISTORY OF ATHEIST PHILOSOPHY IN ANCIENT INDIA

by Yuvaraj
October 26, 2018
0

Dr. K.Veeramani President, Dravidar Kazhagam In ancient period the reasoning faculty was bound by limitations of inability of humans to...

Load More

All Issues

Select Month
    • HOME
    • UNMAI
    • VIDUTHALAI
    • PERIYAR TV
    • PERIYAR PINJU
    Call us: +91 89390 89888

    © 2023 Modern Rationalist Magazine

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Periyar Speaks
    • Social Justice
    • Rationalist
    • Feminism
    • Lovable Life

    © 2023 Modern Rationalist Magazine