• HOME
  • UNMAI
  • VIDUTHALAI
  • PERIYAR TV
  • PERIYAR PINJU
Newsletter
Modern rationalist
Advertisement
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life
No Result
View All Result
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life
No Result
View All Result
Modern rationalist
No Result
View All Result

‘Refusal to wear bangles and Sindoor sign by wife’ ground for divorce

by Modern Rationalist
August 27, 2020
in featured
0
‘Refusal to wear bangles and Sindoor sign by wife’ ground for divorce

Recently the Guhati High Court granted divorce at the plea of the husband on the ground of refusal to wear ‘sakha’ and ‘sindoor’ sign by the wife. Sakha is a bangle made of conch shells that is worn by newlywed women in some customs, while sindoor is vermillion that some Hindu women apply on their heads.

The Bench of the High Court ruled that a categorical refusal by the wife to wear the bangles and sindoor points towards her unwillingness to continue her married life. The court ordered, “under such circumstances, compelling the husband to be in matrimony with the wife may be construed to be harassment”.

Related articles

DECEPTIVE FAITH

March 19, 2025
WHY IS THIS QUOTATION FROM WINSTON CHURCHILL NOT WELL KNOWN?

WHY IS THIS QUOTATION FROM WINSTON CHURCHILL NOT WELL KNOWN?

December 21, 2024

The couple got married in 2012. As per the plea of the husband, the couple lived for a month together in the husband’s house with his relatives and the wife raised the demand to live with the husband separately in another house. The relationship of the couple deteriorated and the wife left the matrimonial house in 2013. She filed a case against the husband and his family members for cruelty and dowry harassment under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The husband and relatives were acquitted and then the husband filed a suit for divorce on the ground of ‘cruelty’ by the wife. She contented the plea alleging harassment at the hands of husbands and in-laws for dowry and that she was denied food and medical treatment.

 The family court turned down the husband’s plea in 2018 but on the appeal made by the husband the High Court overturned the family court verdict.

The High Court observed that the allegation of subjecting the wife to cruelty was not sustained and such acts of lodging criminal cases on unsubstantiated allegations against the husband and or the husband’s family members amount to ‘cruelty’. Further the order said such ‘cruelty’ is also a ground for granting divorce.

Besides the High Court observed that the husband alleged before the lower court that the wife refused to wear sakha and sindoor, and that this contention was not disputed by the wife. “The same remained uncontroverted and is therefore an evidence material for the purpose of this proceedings. Under the custom of Hindu marriage, a lady who has entered into marriage according to Hindu rituals and customs, and which has not been denied by the respondent in her evidence, her refusal to wear ‘ sakha’ and ‘sindoor’ will project her to be unmarried and/or signify her refusal to accept the marriage with the appellant,” the high court ruled.

Courtesy: The Hindustan Times

The mental makeup and understanding between the husband and the wife is more important than the mere observance or refusal of certain rituals and signs imposed as religious customs.

 

Tags: banglescrueltydivorcefeaturedGuhati High CourtharassmentHigh CourtHinduIndian Penal CodematrimonialreligiousThe Hindustan Times
Previous Post

DK Remembers Shahu Maharaj with Rich Tributes

Next Post

‘All India Quota’ is Unconstitutional

Related Posts

DECEPTIVE FAITH

by Modern Rationalist
March 19, 2025
0

I would not have bothered so much to oppose religious extremism and to deny the existence of God, if this...

WHY IS THIS QUOTATION FROM WINSTON CHURCHILL NOT WELL KNOWN?

WHY IS THIS QUOTATION FROM WINSTON CHURCHILL NOT WELL KNOWN?

by Modern Rationalist
December 21, 2024
0

He had highlighted India’s “brahmin problem” very well way back in a speech on March 18, 1931 in Albert Hall,...

A. Padmanaban ‘Ananda Illam’, New 4, IX Cross Street, Sastri Nagar, Chennai-20. Phone: 4910865

by Modern Rationalist
December 21, 2024
0

அன்புள்ள அருமை சகோதரர் தலைவர் திரு.வீரமணி அவர்களுக்கு, வணக்கம். தங்களுடைய பிறந்தநாள் மிகவும் முக்கிய நாளாகும். தங்களுக்கு எல்லா நலன்களும், கீர்த்தியும் சேரவேண்டுமென்று வாழ்த்துகிறேன். தங்கள் சேவை,...

PERIYAR RAMASAMY’S UTTAR PRADESH CONNECTION

PERIYAR RAMASAMY’S UTTAR PRADESH CONNECTION

by Modern Rationalist
December 21, 2024
0

According to available details, Periyar EV Ramasamy came to Uttar Pradesh in 1944, 1959 and 1968. In 1944 and 1959,...

DELIBERATE CONCEALMENT

by Modern Rationalist
December 21, 2024
0

It is customary for the Union government’s Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to publish the data on reservation in...

Load More

All Issues

Select Month
    • HOME
    • UNMAI
    • VIDUTHALAI
    • PERIYAR TV
    • PERIYAR PINJU
    Call us: +91 89390 89888

    © 2023 Modern Rationalist Magazine

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Periyar Speaks
    • Social Justice
    • Rationalist
    • Feminism
    • Lovable Life

    © 2023 Modern Rationalist Magazine