• HOME
  • UNMAI
  • VIDUTHALAI
  • PERIYAR TV
  • PERIYAR PINJU
Newsletter
Modern rationalist
Advertisement
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life
No Result
View All Result
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life
No Result
View All Result
Modern rationalist
No Result
View All Result

Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC 2011) SAME REPORT – TWO VERSIONS

by Modern Rationalist
October 9, 2021
in Social Justice
0
Is 100% Reservation not justifiable?

On 31.8.2016, The Ministry in their action taken reply have stated as under:

“Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, Ministry of Home Affairs has informed that the data has been examined and 98.87% data on individuals’ caste and religion is error free.” [Para 10 of the 27r” report dated 31.8.2016 of the Standing Committee on Rural Development (2015-16)]

Related articles

TAMIL NADU AND THE REPUBLIC OF UNEQUALS: A  MEASURED CASE FOR JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION

TAMIL NADU AND THE REPUBLIC OF UNEQUALS: A MEASURED CASE FOR JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION

February 16, 2026
WELFARE SCHEMES MUST BE PROGRESSIVE

WELFARE SCHEMES MUST BE PROGRESSIVE

July 19, 2025

On 21.9.2021 Affidavit by Social Justice Ministry  before Supreme Court “Para 11. It is apparent that the caste enumeration in SECC 2011 was fraught with mistakes and inaccuracies. A further analysis showed that more than 99 per cent of the castes enumerated had a population of less than 100 persons.

Para 12. For the aforesaid reasons, the details available in the record of the Census pertaining to castes is not reliable either for the purpose of any reservation, whether in admission, employment or elections to local authorities.”

In August, 2016, the RGI and Census Commissioner of India, Ministry of Home Affairs said that “data has been examined and 98.87 per cent data on individuals’ caste and religion is error free”.

In September, 2021, Ministry of Social Justice in its affidavit cited “mistakes, inaccuracies and unusable”, which is in contradiction to the statement of RGI/Census Commissioner.

Who is accountable & responsible  for these contradicting statements?

– G. Karunanidhy, General Secretary, AIOBC

Tags: admissionCaste CensusemploymentG.KarunanidhyMinistryreservationSECC 2011Socio Economicsupreme court
Previous Post

Archakas of the hues

Next Post

Probe-Panel Appropriate Welcome Move

Related Posts

TAMIL NADU AND THE REPUBLIC OF UNEQUALS: A  MEASURED CASE FOR JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION

TAMIL NADU AND THE REPUBLIC OF UNEQUALS: A MEASURED CASE FOR JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION

by Modern Rationalist
February 16, 2026
0

There are moments when a single statistic punctures decades of comfortable rhetoric. Tamil Nadu’s judiciary has produced one such moment....

WELFARE SCHEMES MUST BE PROGRESSIVE

WELFARE SCHEMES MUST BE PROGRESSIVE

by Modern Rationalist
July 19, 2025
0

India is a country, needy of many welfare schemes for its formulation and implementation to liberate its people, who have...

LOVABLE LIFE-161: BENEVOLENT THESPIAN

SOCIAL JUSTICE – BREATH OF DRAVIDIAN MOVEMENT

by Modern Rationalist
July 19, 2025
0

Welcoming the announcement of the Union Government that caste enumeration would be included in the forthcoming census exercise in a...

LOVABLE LIFE-161: BENEVOLENT THESPIAN

DISADVANTAGEOUS DELIMITATION

by Modern Rationalist
March 19, 2025
0

The Union Government headed by the BJP recently dropped a thunderbolt on all the States announcing carrying out of delimitation...

DECEPTIVE FAITH

by Modern Rationalist
March 19, 2025
0

I would not have bothered so much to oppose religious extremism and to deny the existence of God, if this...

Load More

All Issues

  • HOME
  • UNMAI
  • VIDUTHALAI
  • PERIYAR TV
  • PERIYAR PINJU
Call us: +91 89390 89888

© 2023 Modern Rationalist Magazine

No Result
View All Result
  • Periyar Speaks
  • Social Justice
  • Rationalist
  • Feminism
  • Lovable Life

© 2023 Modern Rationalist Magazine